
PRESS STATEMENT
The Legal Implications Of Operation Murambatsvina And Operation Restore
Order
This Commission is an organ which has not been
democratically elected by the people of Harare as is required by the
Constitution, the Urban Councils Act, and various international and regional
human rights treaties to which Zimbabwe is a State Party. Instead it was
unilaterally appointed by the Minister of Local Government, Public Works and
Urban Development. The appointment of the Harare Commission has been legally
challenged in a pending application in the High Court. As such, ZLHR is of the
considered view that any actions taken by and on behalf of the Commission,
including the Operations, are subject to scrutiny and challenge.
The legality and adequacy of this Notice has
been challenged, on the grounds that the notice given was vague (in that the
affected persons were not clearly identified, and the action required to be
taken by each category was not clearly stipulated), inadequate (many affected
people were never aware of the publication of the Notice, or that it pertained
to their structures and activities) and unprocedural (in terms of the Regional,
Town and Country Planning Act, the Urban Councils Act, and the Housing
Standards Act, inter alia). This
challenge has still not been considered by the High Court. Until such time as it
is, we are of the considered view that all action by the Harare Commission and all
those acting through it, and countrywide, should have been suspended and is
illegal.
This period of notice has been blatantly ignored
and in fact that the unlawful actions continued unabated and were well underway
as at 20 June 2005.
We are of the considered view that the
legislation is subject to constitutional challenge and in fact such challenge
is currently being finalised for filing in the Constitutional Court of
Zimbabwe.
This is not the case. As the litigation clearly
indicates, many people with valid leases, proper planning permission and
compliance with laws have been unlawfully victimised and have suffered extensive
damage and suffering.
Further, regardless of whether the people and/or
properties were “illegal”, this does not excuse or legitimise the government’s
failure to adhere to the principles of natural justice and proper
administrative remedies, more so where the government has failed to provide
adequate notice and/or alternative accommodation and attendant facilities to
mitigate the impacts of its action on the affected people.
It should also be noted that it is the
responsibility of the police, and not the local authorities, to deal with
criminal activities. The local authorities therefore acted illegally and
unprocedurally in instructing the police, on their behalf, to demolish homes
and stalls in order to put a stop to alleged criminal enterprises.
The
action taken was not reasonable. It was precipitate, indiscriminate, manifestly
excessive and disproportionate. If people had been given adequate notice of the
action, they would have had time to dismantle structures, salvage whatever
materials they could from their structures, and move property to store it
elsewhere. As little or no warning was given to people, people were not able to
do so .It is a general principle of administrative law that when administrative
authorities are exercising powers, they should do so in a manner that will minimise
loss. This principle has not been adhered to during the Operations.
ZLHR
is of the considered view that the authorities have violated several of the key
protective provisions. These are:
These
rights and freedoms are also protected by way of regional and international
human rights instruments, to which Zimbabwe is a State Party, and thus the
State, through its actions, has also acted in violation of the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the
Convention on All Forms of Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, the
Convention on the Rights of the Child, the African Charter on Human and
Peoples’ Rights and the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the
African Child.
Further
rights enshrined in these human rights instruments which have been violated by
the authorities include:
·
the protection
of the family by society and state;
·
the right to
work;
·
the right to
education;
·
the right to
the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health;
·
the right to an
adequate standard of living including adequate food, clothing and housing and
to the continuous improvement of living conditions
·
the right to a
general satisfactory environment favourable to the development of the people
The
State, under the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, has an
obligation to ensure the right of the people to their economic, social and
cultural development. Under the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of
the Child, a duty is also imposed on the State to ensure the survival, protection
and development of the child, to protect and support the establishment and
development of the family as the natural unit and basis of society, and to
provide material assistance and support programmes for the nutrition, health,
education, clothing and housing of the child. It is clear that, rather than
complying with such obligations, the State has acted in a manner which violates
the very spirit of the Charters and their contents.
In
the High Court the manner of disposal of urgent challenges of the Operations has
been unduly prolonged and this is of great concern, especially when the very
lives of affected people depend on swift, impartial and professional service
and subsequent enforcement of orders. Regrettably judges have shown an
unwillingness to deal firmly and decisively with perpetrators of human rights
violations, which in turn has led to people losing faith in the ability of the
judicial process to offer them protection or other satisfactory remedies.
The
cases ZLHR has filed in the Magistrates’ Court seeking urgent relief have,
however, been dealt with on an urgent basis and relief has been granted, albeit
that the authorities have chosen to ignore court orders and continue with
activities which have been held to be unlawful. The most recent example
occurred yesterday on Porta Farm. Local authorities and police acted in blatant
contempt of two existing High Court orders barring them from removing people
from the property, assaulting them or destroying their property. ZLHR obtained
a third interdict against them in the Norton Magistrates’ Court late yesterday.
This has been served on the relevant parties, but the evictions and destruction
of property and livelihoods is continuing today.
ZLHR
is of the considered view that such a programme would have been achieved more
beneficially through an orderly process of research, verification, consultation
and subsequent action, including the regularisation of any purported illegal
structures rather than their demolition. Attempts by the Government now to
appear as the benefactors of a development programme, which is long overdue,
and could have been more effectively achieved through proper planning and
implementation and without the concomitant destruction and serious human rights
violations, are frankly misconstrued and dishonest. Government has not provided
information on how the exercise will be funded and who the beneficiaries of the
new developments will be. Those displaced and thrown back to rural areas or
even open spaces will not be able to register for, or access, such developments
as they are currently occupied in fighting for their very survival. In
addition, they have not been provided with restitution, compensation and
guarantees of non-repetition from the State despite the extensive damage done.
In any event, to suggest that the joint Operations are over, when Porta Farm
and other areas are being devastated as we sit in this room, is a blatant
untruth, shows utter contempt of the presence of the Special Envoy of the UN
Secretary-General in the country, and indicates that the Government is not interested
in even providing a veneer of legality, whoever may be observing.
The actions taken by the authorities are
illegal and have contravened key provisions of domestic and international law.
The Operations have caused massive human rights violations and a serious
humanitarian crisis, and must be condemned in the strongest of terms. These are
issues of extreme severity and need to be fully investigated in order to place
the forced evictions into their proper perspective. The actions of the
Ministries, the local authorities and the law enforcement agencies have led to
severe loss of life, livelihoods, and property, and have impacted and continue
to impact on the basic economic, social, cultural, civil and political rights
of hundreds of thousands of affected people in Zimbabwe.
As a member of the United Nations
Commission on Human Rights, Zimbabwe should be advocating for the respect and
implementation of key Resolutions on forced evictions passed in 1993
(Resolution 1993/77), 1998 (Resolution 1998/9), and 2004 (Resolution 2004/28),
instead of perpetrating the very violations the Resolutions intended to
prevent.
ZLHR
therefore calls upon the Special Envoy of the United Nations Secretary-General
to: